L5 · Simplifying Expressions with Rational Exponents
“I can read a^(m/n) in both of its radical dresses, choose the root-first route to keep numbers small, convert general rational exponents in both directions, and apply all five exponent laws when the exponents are simple fractions.”
Evaluate 8^(2/3) - twice. First, read the exponent with L4's mapping, extended: the denominator (3) is the index - a cube root is involved; the numerator (2) is a power - something gets squared. Route 1 (root first): 8^(2/3) = (cube root of 8)^2 = 2^2 = 4. The base shrank from 8 to 2 before any squaring. Route 2 (power first): 8^(2/3) = cube root of (8^2) = cube root of 64 = 4. Same value - but the route passed through 64. Verdict, stated plainly: in a no-technology unit, take the root first whenever the root is exact. The dresses are equal (both are the same number, by the laws); the workloads are not.
For 27^(2/3), why is the root-first route easier even though both routes are correct?
Evaluate 16^(3/4) -> 8 (root first: fourth root of 16 = 2; then 2^3 = 8)
"32^(2/5) by the root-first route: the fifth root of 32 is ___; then raise it to the 2nd power: ___^2 = ___" -> 2; 2; 4
10 scored questions with a 3-rung hint ladder. Mastery needs 8/10 plus both gate questions.