L4 · Irrational numbers on the number line
“I can tell whether a number is rational or irrational, approximate an irrational number to the nearest whole number and nearest tenth, and place it on a number line with reasons — using neighbouring perfect squares as benchmarks.”
Sort into rational and irrational: √9, √10, 0.333…, 1.1010010001…, −√25, 4/11. Step 1: Evaluate every radical you can: √9 = 3 (an integer -> rational). −√25 = −5 (rational). 4/11 is a ratio of integers (rational), and 0.333… repeats (rational). Step 2: √10: 10 is not a perfect square, so √10 cannot be a whole number — and in fact its decimal (3.162277…) never terminates and never repeats -> irrational. Step 3: 1.1010010001… has a pattern (one more zero each time) but no block ever repeats, and it never ends -> irrational. A pattern is not the same as a repeating block. Say it plainly: rational ⟺ terminates or repeats ⟺ writable as a ratio of integers. A square root is irrational exactly when the radicand is not a perfect square.
Why is 1.1010010001… irrational even though it clearly has a pattern?
Which of these are irrational: √16, √17, 0.7̄ (0.777…), −√8? -> √17 and −√8 (16 is a perfect square so √16 = 4, rational; 0.777… repeats, rational; 17 is not a perfect square, and 8 is not either, so both roots are irrational).
"√17 is irrational because 17 is not a ___ ___, so the decimal of √17 never ___ and never ___." -> perfect square; terminates; repeats
10 scored questions with a 3-rung hint ladder. Mastery needs 8/10 plus both gate questions.